再论述：一个马华文学论述在台湾的系谱（或抒情）与分歧叙事
Sinophone Malaysian Literary Discourse in Taiwan: A (Lyrical) Genealogy of Forking Narratives

张锦忠 TEE Kim Tong
台湾高雄国立中山大学外文系副教授、兼华语中心主任。
E-mail: [email protected]

马来西亚华人研究学刊，第16期，2013年，页41-63
Journal of Malaysian Chinese Studies, Volume 16, 2013: 41-63

摘要

从1991年林建国在淡江大学发表〈为什么马华文学？〉到黄锦树的《马华文学与民族—国家》一书的出版，超过二十年的时间过去了，马华文学论述在台湾已完成学院建制，其所关注的马华文学议题从马华文学的现象、本质、身份属性、场域位置、文学史、作家论、到文学活动，大致上可以归纳为集体的“马华文学（史）”与国家文学这两个面向。另一方面，我们所做的，无非就是描述与践行我们对马华文学（史）与文学的立场。描述马华文学（史）必然是在学术社群话语的视野内进行，争议与辩证在所难免。选择论述马华文学，无非是它攸关我们的身份属性与认同政治。身为全球冷战结构下东（南）亚洲的离散族裔，我们的理论、实践与文化生产，其实也只是我辈自我理解的（分歧）路径。

关键词：马华文学论述、马华文学史、国家文学、身份属性、认同政治

Abstract

It has been more than two decades since Lim Kien Ket presented his seminar paper “Why Sinophone Malaysian Literature?” at the Tamkang conference in 1991 and Sinophone Malaysian Literature has accomplished its institutionalization in Taiwan. Such issues as name and nature, identity, field, position as well as history of Sinophone Malaysian Literature are also included in the discussions in Ng Kim Chew’s Latest book entitled Sinophone Malaysian Literature and Nation-State, published in 2014, which focuses on various aspects of literary history and national literature. Sinophone Malaysian Literary discourse as explored by Lim, Ng and other scholars manifest their different positions shaped by their identity and politics of recognition.

Keywords: Sinophone Malaysian Literature, literary history, national literature, identity, politics of recognition

如欲购书，您可以：