关于辜礼欢祖籍地“古宅说”的质疑与“白礁辜厝说”的考证
Revisiting the Claims of “Guzhai Village” and “Baijiao Gucuo Village” as Koh Lay Hwan’s Ancestral Home with New Evidences

蔡少谦 CAI Shaoqian
中国厦门市海沧区闽南文化研究会。
E-mail: [email protected]

摘要

辜礼欢的祖籍地，文史界有两种说法最为常见，其一为泉州市惠安县辜厝社，其二为厦门市翔安区古宅村。其他说法还有厦门说、厦门翔安浦尾说和漳州海澄说等，这些说法中属古宅说的考证资料最全。本文通过对同安县古今地名沿革、海沧碑铭史料、白礁村田野调查、槟城辜氏家族的记载等内容的研究，结合同安说、海澄说两种说法的论据推断辜礼欢的祖籍地应为原属泉州府同安县、今属漳州市龙海区的白礁村。

关键词：辜礼欢、祖籍地、同安县、三都

Abstract

There are two most widely supported claims to the location of Koh Lay Hwan’s ancestral home in the current literature, namely Gucuo Village in Huian County of Quanzhou City and Guzhai Village in Xiang’an District of Xiamen City. Other speculated locations include Jinjiang City, Xiamen City, Puwei Village of Xiang’an District and Haicheng County. Of all the locations listed, the case of Guzhai Village offers the most extensive reference materials for research. Investigations into the names of places in Tong’an County from the past to the present, gravestone inscriptions in Haicang District, fieldwork findings in Baijiao Village, historical records of the Koh family in Penang, together with supporting evidence presented by other claims pointing towards Tong’an and Haicheng lead this paper to deduce that Baijiao Village, originally belonged to Tong’an County of Quanzhou Prefecture and now belongs to Longhai District of Zhangzhou City is the correct location of Koh Lay Hwan’s ancestral home.

Keywords: Koh Lay Hwan, Ancestral Home, Tongan County, Sam Toh

 

如欲购书，您可以：